Back when Charleoi was posting questions for the CC (I beleive it was the one before this last one), I suggested he tone his attitude down toward Phil when phrasing the questions so that things could be approached in a more productive manner.
Regardless, we are asked to not call each other names on these boards because that does not get us very far in getting REAL answers to our concerns, and sidetracks conversations into nonproductive mud-slinging contests.
However, you are correct that I should not have addressed that post so much to you but more to Tarantula because he was the poster who initiated the negativity toward another poster. Direct negativity towards other posters is different from being negative toward the company or the people making decisions about how the company is run. I do not believe IHUB has rules against countering what other posters are posting, even if you are quite negative in the manner in which you present your counter argument, but they do have rules against directly attacking another poster. That just wastes everybody's time and avoids the real issues that affect our investment. That is the rule I am trying to support with my comment to you and tarantula.
No problem with tarantula posting "Shall I forward you all the necessary info so that you can finally file suit? We are all anxious for you to file. Let me guess, you are going to continue to pontificate without ONE bit of action." But once it goes into personal insults that have absolutely nothing to do with how the poster views the company, really, what does that provide for us and our investment? That is where it needs to stop.
AI
