InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 157
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2014

Re: stockmarketdouble post# 145769

Friday, 10/31/2014 12:12:27 AM

Friday, October 31, 2014 12:12:27 AM

Post# of 194795
The document released does have some differences than the one posted last week - the previously omitted company names are no longer obscured. Is this life altering, revelation type PR? Probably not, but what's your point? It's a different version of the document. It has been released. It is another piece of information. How is that possibly construed as being horrendous? BigA never claimed it to be NEW NEWS, he said "news." And that's exactly what it is.

News. And he has every right to post any bit of information on here. If the mods disagree so vehemently, it will be removed. But it's still up.

Also, we don't know if this document sheds light on the deficiencies being addressed. I'm sure the 15 to 24 FPS, the steel mesh, and having transparent glass pods with cameras and readers are not an impossible barricade. These are MINOR DEFICIENCIES. It's not like major changes to infrastructure are being requested.

The document is obviously from an HC affiliate. It is dated 7/31/2014. They cannot put out a PR stating that HC officials performed an inspection when no inspection by HC was completed. HC Would hold them responsible to retract the statement and certainly impose legal penalties, not to mention such a suggestion is so preposterous bc it would suggest they would be willing to jeopardize a plan that has been over 12 months in the making.


I too have questions for you. WHY WOULD THE COMPANY LIE ABOUT HC PERFORMING AN INSPECTION?! How can they get away with it when they know MMJ stock are being monitored by SEC??? Why can they falsify such information when they KNOW the ramifications once HC FINDS OUT- which they would- including loss of any potential bid for license.


Makes. No. Sense.