InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253268
Next 10
Followers 22
Posts 883
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/31/2010

Re: jbog post# 183326

Wednesday, 10/29/2014 3:07:29 PM

Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:07:29 PM

Post# of 253268

What I meant was that at this time I think it's probably fully valued.




While I am not sure that I would agree that GILD is "fully valued," it is hard to argue that it is undervalued at ~110. Since I still believe in the modified cliff for HCV (much lower sales in '18 and beyond), I do believe a pretty low p/e is appropriate. The issue is how low for the p/e and how high for normalized earnings. Wells Fargo upped the valuation range from $123-127 to $135-138. It has earnings topping at $12.77/sh in '17, primarily based on peak HCV sales of $15.865B (out of $28.976B total). I still think those numbers are too low for the peak, but that the peak will be in '16, not '17. Bottom line, I think that am generally a holder 'til 120 or so (having previously said 115). Since I have taken a lot of profits already, I will probably wait 'til '15 to sell my Jan 60 calls and then wait for long-term treatment for the rest of the longer options and to cut back on the outright shares. Net, net I am still comfortable holding, even though it is no longer undervalued. JMO.

As far as Gilead goes, the current management at least added around $125 Billion in market-cap over the last 5 years or so.

I'd be happy to award them 5% of that. My bigger problems is with the smaller bio companies that give 5% with nothing to show for it.



I think that 5% is too big a number. They are getting paid in current dollars to do their job. Getting a bonus is fine, but not in the BILLIONS. Agreed as to smaller bios. JMO.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.