Intel Corp (INTC)

[Ixse]

Kate, because all other articles tell a different story. Here's one example. It shows that the motion was Intel's (does not mention Farnan asking for it) + Farnan will decide on May 2 (i.e. he simply hasn't decided yet to speed up the case by limiting it to US only): http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1952207,00.asp
Upon announcing it would move to limit the case US only the judge told Intel it's unlikely to be granted unless both parties agree on the facts. Farnan then told Intel to file the motion before May 7: http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&siteid=google&guid=%7B48B58...

Taken together that's exactly what I said.

Regards,

Rink