InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 376
Posts 17197
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: Ringohalfcan post# 11644

Tuesday, 10/28/2014 11:18:24 AM

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 11:18:24 AM

Post# of 106841
"All speculation and negative bias."??

Well, those are all actual numbers taken from the company's own 10-K and 10-Q filings? Actual historic accounting entries made by BHRT, and/or their professional auditor(s) and signed off by their own CEO each time. Those numbers/accounting entries are supposed to be a 100% accurate account and representation of the company's finances and financial history.

When I learned basic mathematics, then later a great deal of advanced mathematics and then physics, etc and then even some accounting, one thing taught as a "fundamental" truth- is that math and numbers are specifically used because they have no inherent "bias" or ability to contain "biases" or contain "speculation", unless they are specifically stated to be "estimates", in which case, then "speculation" can be present.

But using PAST TENSE, already filed 10-K's and 10-Q's published by BHRT itself, etc means those documents and numbers should be "bias" and "speculation" free, IMO?

Any other numbers to present from the company's SEC filings or similar to show where there are errors or anything incorrect would be greatly appreciated.

Good luck to ya.