InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 103
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/12/2013

Re: valueyoda post# 13149

Sunday, 10/26/2014 10:32:38 PM

Sunday, October 26, 2014 10:32:38 PM

Post# of 57775
Oh man. It's like you and Sox are scraping the bottom of the barrel today. First Sox launches his war on "Temple isn't even a good school!" campaign, and now, you post a link that is a rebuttal to Tao's research methods.

Oh the problems...

1) This is the paper that goes along with a student poster-presentation at pretty cool conference. As I'm sure you know, the standard of acceptance at most conferences are significantly higher than in peer-reviewed academic journals.

2) The paper is concerned because Tao has only tested his methods on particulates in blood and on light crude, and that there had been no pilot experiments done on a pipeline.

3) The paper agrees that the principles Tao is working with are right, but he should just do some different tests instead.

4) The author is an undergraduate who describes himself as: "I am hard-working kind of guy and show more devotion towards the task has been given to me. Being curious to learn and explore new things I would love to go in the field of research in oil & gas sector."

Given the amount of grief that bashers have given Tao and Temple in the past I find it a bit laughable that your tremendous DD failed to notice that the author is just a kid with no qualifications, yet you try to pass this off as a serious rebuttal.