Blackout Media Corp (BKMP)

[maninfla]

re: "...Let's list the good things that you would not PR..."

1) Buyback of shares - Need to keep price low to execute this effectively.

really?
then why did they PR a buyback?
could it have been to bolster SP as new shares were being flooded onto the street?

2) The change in ownership structure to give BKMP more ownership of TFN - This has legal implications and no companies discuss merger/acquisition activities until all paperwork/contracts/legalities are formalized.

first of all BKMP DOES NOT have any ownership of TFN...it is reportedly of blackout comm
secondly, didnt they also PR their intention of increasing said ownership?
could it have been to bolster SP as new shares were being flooded onto the street?

3) Same applies for USA carrier agreements, it's a negotiation of a legal contract. The parties will never discuss deal details before it's done, approved, and signed.

really?
then what are announcements that just about everyone of these "gems" announces of LOIs and the like?
and hasnt the company PRd this intention many times?
could it have been to bolster SP as new shares were being flooded onto the street?

4) Moving up to a new exchange - This is pertinent here but there's mandatory 2 weeks or so of corporate silence before such an event can occur.

really?
can you provide a link to substantiate this "mandatory 2 weeks or so of corporate silence"?
and even so, without a RM [and most probably another HUGE RS], they have years of filings to become current before that could even be considered

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)