Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:31:15 PM
Do you really want to bring the discussion up from the 'banter' level and actually discuss the patents?
I am more than willing to do so, just say the word.
We can start with the first one based on the premise that higher throughput can be achieved by using one temperature chamber set at an intermediate temperature instead of two chambers set at different temperatures.
Can you think of a way to get around that one?
How about two chambers? LOL
How about the second one that does not have one single claim survive from the original application. I repeat EVERY claim made in the initial application was either discarded or rewritten. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy, how about you?
On second thought bag, you'd be better off running away and hiding for a while..
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM