Friday, October 24, 2014 1:50:55 PM
you also say 2. "tmm claims it is using VDK 1.0-1.4 in its "trudef" product. The Iterated lawyers have already confirmed in writing that tmm has no rights to any Iterated tech, including the VDK 1.0-1.4. Read about it on the Dimension site court papers."
Do the current lawyers know about this? If so, why didn't they state that in their response that is posted on Demensions website? Page 6 paragraph 16 TMMI states they wholly own outright vdk 1.0-1.4 and defendants answer on page 3 paragraph 16 agreeing with them..... maybe you should tell them your stories.
As it is now....in court papers filed in 2014, both parties agree that TMMI owns vdk 1.0-1.4 wholly.
Maybe they missed that one? or maybe you missed that one? but if you only state facts, you can refer to any old papers from anyone, but everyone in this case (BOTH SIDES) agree TMMI owns vdk1.0-1.4
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM