InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 764
Posts 43017
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 03/11/2004

Re: Patentinvestor post# 56128

Friday, 10/24/2014 1:34:56 PM

Friday, October 24, 2014 1:34:56 PM

Post# of 68424
"Second" was a jab at Mayer, and rightfully so as Mayer has held that position in prior appeals where he searched to reverse under 101.

Although it's a poke at Mayer, his concurrence is not a part of the main opinion of the case, and the reason for the reversal. It really doesn't do a lot for their argument for en banc rehearing, although it indicates Mayer's willingness to reverse the trial court in a patent case under whatever grounds he could.



I am not a broker and profess to know nothing about trading stocks. Do your own DD. Buy, don't buy...sell, or don't sell at your own risk.