Really benny743? You seem to be an "Eddie" guy all the way. Seeing it drop to .0004 must be painful.
In answer, as posted here, the former "workers", "contract labor", "employee" were not paid by Eddie and company. A local TV investigative reporter realized this would dovetail nicely with "Eddie's" current criminal case as in both cases, theft is involved. The former "workers", "contract labor", "employee" were interviewed at the former Water To Fuel shop on Leo Lane. We still have not seen Mr. Vakser at the Roundtable address for his opportunity to view the recorded session and comment for the record before it airs. Understand this, with all his talk, Mr. Vakser has never said their claim was not a valid claim. In the case of the former "workers", "contract labor", "employee", there is clearly theft of service on the part of PBS Holdings (PBHG). Mr. Vakser and company saw fit to pay one of the former employees last week which validates the claim of all since all were in the same situation and have the same claim. The difference? They wanted this particular former "worker", "contract labor" to provide insight on manufacturing procedures since all legitimate access to manufacturing procedures was terminated. It was terminated when they failed to pay the "employee" Mr Reed and the owner of the technology, FuelfromH2o. Our interview with the owner of the technology also shows that PBS Holding (PBHG) failed to pay according to the contract. .
As for his indictment for theft, that is public information and a matter before the court. He is due back on Wednesday to file another extension.
