![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, October 20, 2014 2:03:21 PM
This defense is inadequate as Fannie Mae is not in receivership. It is the same inexcusable defense for Judge Lamberth to rule on cherry picked HERA laws that only apply to receivership. It is the same use of media reporting that the companies are in receivership as just illustrated again this weekend in the article written by Randall Forsyth stating the entities are in federal receivership.
The USG is clearly trying to replace the conservatorship with receivership and it is not ok.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM
North Bay Resources Commences Gold Shipments, Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Enters Taber Gold Mine JV, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 9, 2024 9:15 AM
Simple Stock Loans Announces Unique Solutions For Investors Looking for Alternative Liquidity Amidst Recent Small Cap Rally Sep 6, 2024 9:30 AM
Reliant Coffee Debuts at #271 on the Inc. 5000 List of Fastest Growing Companies - Coffee Service Industry Disruptor Brews Up Exponential Growth Sep 5, 2024 11:51 AM
VAYK Confirms Receiving Revenue from First Airbnb Property with 1.4 Million Annual Revenue Goal • VAYK • Sep 4, 2024 9:34 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Expands Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: New Lens Intercepts 21.75 m at 5.25 g/t Gold & 515 ppm Cobalt • MFL • Sep 4, 2024 9:02 AM