Thursday, October 16, 2014 4:20:15 AM
In its Final Written Decision, the Board found that Petitioner proved that claims 1-3 of the ’105 Patent are unpatentable. The ’105 Patent relates to monitoring the level of a substance in a liquid, particularly the level of glucose in blood.
And then to add to it:
Patent Owner next argued that the combination of Winarta and Schulman fails to meet all limitations of the challenged claims, but the Board found this unpersuasive because Patent Owner only addressed the references individually and not in a combination. The Board then found that once again, Patent Owner’s evidence of secondary considerations was not enough to overcome the obviousness finding.
And who is this board? Legal minds (judges) scientists and professionals. And they decided in favour of DECN against J&J. Well if this is not good enough for me, what then. If we Need more evidence of the Quality of the DECN Management, this is it. They beat J&J 3 times and this speaks for the qualification of K.B. as CEO of DECN.
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q3 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over 100% in Net Income for 1st 9 months of 2024 vs 2023 • ACGX • Nov 14, 2024 8:30 AM
Unitronix Corp. Publishes Its Cryptocurrency Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Nov 14, 2024 8:05 AM
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM