Wednesday, October 15, 2014 2:12:31 PM
But my point was that LVVV is liable, not necessarily the shareholders. So we're in agreement on that point. Except Curt Kramer, he obviously knew he was not eligible to continue engaging in his illegal activities and probably should not have been allowed to invest at all even if he never sold his position.
LVVV has the right to refuse the lifting of restricted legends when shareholders attempt to sell. The transfer agent will notify LVVV whenever a Rule 144 sale is attempted, and if the company knows its shareholder is not eligible to rely on Rule 144 then the company must refuse the request. It is then up to the shareholder to fight for that right if they believe the company is mistaken or has no right to block the unregistered securities from public resale.
FEATURED Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. enter Strategic Partnership to Commercialize Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology • BLO • May 16, 2024 8:13 AM
Avant Technologies to Revolutionize Data Center Management with Proprietary AI Software Platform • AVAI • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM