InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 1376
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/30/2003

Re: 10 bagger post# 40793

Tuesday, 04/18/2006 10:51:29 AM

Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:51:29 AM

Post# of 173788
OT - 10bag

No, no, not meant in any way to be a personal attack at you or anyone else, except the original splicer. No charges were made against you, so you cannot be guilty as charged. Apologies if it seemed otherwise.

I'm sure I've copied and pasted things that weren't correct too.

But it just serves as a good example as to why we should always try to verify things at the source to be sure of what was said. I'm always a little leery whenever I see a story where someone is summarizing what someone else supposedly said. If a splicer says so-and-so allegedly said such-and-such in Forbes, then why didn't the splicer provide a link to the original source document?

Sort of like when someone says, "Every scientist agrees . . ." Oh really? What's your source for that? Often times it's just somebody pushing their own agenda, usually to make money.

Anyway, enough said. Back to stock talk.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.