The only intended point, by me, in those posted links, was to say that the infos suggested to me, the possibility of prior art or, as has been pointed out to me, "for sale bar". I don't who said what at this point, but it sure looked as tho I was being painted as having provided info that "rendered vplm LI as useless. No way I did that.. But the questions & doubts certainly do remain. You do at least seem to agree that as solid & powerful a picture has been painted by the BOD (and most on this mb), regards the portfolio in general, the fact remains (I think this is what you mean by "useless") that there doesn't seem to be ANY positive developments in the way of real offers, infringement letters, or responses to, licencing, or anything along those lines. All we hear basically amount to to fluff & self touts, no beef.
It was a whole different vibe & general concensus, here on this mb, back about a year or so ago, when the patents were beginning to come thru approved. The main thrust then, was that all we were waiting for was the patent approvals & then, immediately this whole thing would take off like a rocket & a sale would them be imminent & would happen quickly & for a big big price. Many said basically that. But then the patents came & nothing happened (reminds me greatly of "Y2K") & then much of the commentary took on a whole new tack, basically ignoring it back pedaling on those earlier predictions, instead taking on the whole" it takes time" theme. Plenty of time has passed for plenty of development to have happened, in one way or another, but basically, other than a few excitable PR's, not a damn thing appears to have happened, except a slow but sure erosion of pps.
All this talk of offers, but apparently none there. Talk of infringement by many, but no action taken, when with all the powerful legal representation we supposedly possess. Now the talk of infringement letters, but no evidence or indication of any kind that such has occurred & no one anywhere seems to give a dang about that. All the talk about fortune 500 & S&P 500, whatever, having expressed major interest in us, going back near 2 yrs ago, but there also appears to be no evidence of that either.
This is not bashing. This is not negative. It is simply & purely observations of the apparent reality, which quite reasonably & logically, raises all sorts of questions. With all the ancillary revelations that have been made here, that do a fair job to raise doubts at least, I think it's not exactly critical thinking or balanced, to characterize vplm as "all is fine & good" and/or "stay the course" and/or "the pot o gold" at the end of the rainbow is there & will be realized but it just takes time...
Something just doesn't seem right... anymore
