Hard to tell for sure, NJ. Recent tests - cysto, biopsies, FISH and CAT scan with contrast - all turn out negative for ca. However, an ultra-sensitive new test by Oncoblot indicates presence. The urologist thinks that test may be too sensitive?!? Since all of those tests used to be positive (indicate presence of cancer) I think I'm gradually winning the battle. At least, I like to think so.
I'll repeat the Oncoblot test in a year and see what it turns up. I have to laugh at my insurance company. They won't cover the $850 cost at all, but they strongly recommend a visual test that costs at least ten times as much.
I've stockpiled about a year's supply, so I'm still taking Anatabloc as usual.
Dino
