InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 1076
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/20/2006

Re: CluelessStockJunkie post# 961

Friday, 10/10/2014 2:50:39 PM

Friday, October 10, 2014 2:50:39 PM

Post# of 1058
guess my last post got removed. must have hit too close to home for someone.

volume isnt too bad all things considering. i wasnt expecting an immediate tanking but more like slow speed with surges here and there.

the main debt holder has the largest vested interest in seeing this succeed than anyshareholder and they remained investing and capitalizing throughout 2014. so what changed if anything? they are still pushing Wodka hard on social media and the distillery should have been producing product in 3Q.

biggest risk for common shareholder is the value of BK for the debt holder as an "asset" to offset gains elsewhere. tough spot for the common holder to be in but a real possibility.

flip side - SO (Sarbanes Oxley) legislation compliance is VERY expensive for small companies (probably starting around $250-500K and up) and just may nto be worth it with the small shareholder base and limited capital. besides, with the debt holder controlling a majority - they really do not need to rely on shareholder votes for any major decisions.

if they remain legit and above board - they can still report through pinksheets.com at a fraction of the cost and keep the stock trading viably.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.