InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,875.67
(
-0.03%
)
Post# of 92948
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

SMD2014

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 125
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/09/2014

SMD2014

Re: farviewhill post# 74458

Thursday, 10/09/2014 9:44:11 AM

Thursday, October 09, 2014 9:44:11 AM

Post# of 92948
I totally agree with you Farviewhill. There is no partnership concluded since it is a material event which shall be released by ACTC. Shareholders do not want to dilute the company. I can understand. But if they do not dilute they will not be able to find the funds for Phase II and III. ACTC has at leat 5-6 years to go prior to commercialization of the RPE cells. They need money.

So what do you prefer: loosing your total investment because ACTC is not able to handle the Phase II and III; or Dilute to get a lot of gains after they succeed with the commercialization?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up