Rim Semiconductor Company (fka RSMI)

[hitimer]

Greg, re the question of whether NVE's prominent presence on the NV website detracts from our main thrust, i.e., technology, your points are well taken. However I'd add most assuredly that the pre-eminent phase of our efforts will assert itself once the ducks are lined up, the technology comes into fruition, and the funds begin to flow. Then, I'd say, we could have Mickey Mouse on the front page of the website and the share-buying wouldn't slow down one iota. OK, perhaps overstated (just a tad ) but I do want to make the point that the movie and the tech are in competition - your major point - only for a limited time on the website for viewer's attention, as things stand now. My observations are that this comparison will be moot once the tech mushrooms forth and commands the attention of pending investors, not to mention the media blitz's affect on the s/p. So, for the time being, it may seem quixotic to newbies and to potential investors who have not fully done their dd to see such quizzical prominence given to a movie. Once they delve into its back ground and financial importance to NV, the truth of the matter will dawn upon them, imo, and all will be well in their perceptions and understanding of why it is on the NV website. As far as the RAQ's. the info was well-presented and resolves most points raised on the board for the past week. .Bringing Chen in was a masterstroke, IMHO, and serves to point out that our advisors are being made use of most advantageously. His voice and opinion carry considerable weight and it falls upon the shoulders of those who disagree to argue otherwise. As I alluded in a past post, whatever it took to attract him, and similarly highly-qualified advisors was money well-spent. Were it not for these people,I doubt that we could have achieved a fraction of what we now have, and in half the time (my casual guess) at that. I certainly concur with those who see the funds arising from the movie being a financial bulwark for NVEI, one that will see us
through until corporate and tech events lead loan officers to open the banks's coffers, and at attractive numbers. I see no countervailing forces, at this time, to dissuade me from this line of reasoning. I invite any thoughts to the contrary, hopefully based upon logic and/or equally weighted observations which devolve negatively against these
conclusions. Good luck to all. Rob