InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2014

Re: rolvram post# 17717

Tuesday, 10/07/2014 2:58:05 PM

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 2:58:05 PM

Post# of 46699
Rolvram,

I understand this somewhat better now.

It really hadn't dawned on me why ATVI would agree to move forward unless there was a good chance that if the case were refiled they would potentially be on the hook back to the provisional application. As you say, argued they did and the decision was reached to march forward.

I believe if ATVI had the choice, and weren't concerned with potential larger damages, due to the patents being valid, they would have stalled and delayed this litigation further and thereby killing WDDD completely due to the delay.

Thanks!