InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2014

Re: rolvram post# 17715

Tuesday, 10/07/2014 12:56:49 PM

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:56:49 PM

Post# of 46486
ROLVRAM,

Where's the proof that WDDD refered to the provisional patent in their 490' filing? Did the USPTO agree to such a mistake. If so, I didn't see that in the certificate of correction.

There's no "proof in the pudding" as the Judge left open the option for WDDD's and ATVI to agree to the judges opinion, and keep moving forward based on her findings or refile the case. either way the damages period would be the same... from the date of the certified correction forward as per her judgment. She wasn't giving any special treatment, just a simple option to not have to repeat the case from scratch.

Why are you using all caps?