InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

Re: fastpathguru post# 136836

Wednesday, 10/01/2014 2:25:46 AM

Wednesday, October 01, 2014 2:25:46 AM

Post# of 151660
No, fpg, you don't understand "perfectly". Revenue is what Intel is making on the Atom before they discount BOM differences - so if they managed to come in as the #2 supplier in terms of *revenue*, it should tell you two things. First, Atom doesn't have a pricing problem (pricing MUST be good to capture so much share) - what they have is a cost problem, which is easily fixable, and by doing so, they should get the same pricing, without needing contra-revenue. Second, it should imply to you that *volume* shipments should be even further ahead of Qualcomm and others, since Intel got to 19% revenue share while missing most of the premium design wins. To me that's a lot more impressive. I'm not sure who the loser is in all of this, but it's not even the end of 2014, and Intel seems to be cleaning up. At this rate, I'd expect some attrition of low end players, as the market consolidates - which should also help Intel to grow margins within their share of the market.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News