InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1346
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/06/2014

Re: jkuhr post# 249594

Tuesday, 09/30/2014 11:58:48 PM

Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:58:48 PM

Post# of 798657
This is a silly argument.

Then why do you have companies that get sued by shareholders for losing value or misleading when.

"its always the nature of stock, that you could lose all your investment" as in stock is not a guarantee of profits or loses. And the fact that you lost money if for no other reason of theft, is in itself a probability that you could have always lost and therefore, reason that you could lose it.

So, apply this to a murder case.... Well, jury, there was always the possibility that the criminal could murder the victim, and the victim, had to have reasonable expectation that as a person, death would come, and likely will have come, and therefore, just because the murderer committed it, well, that is what could have occurred and since it did, well. it did.

This is to me a silly argument.