Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:52:29 PM
The WT indenture has Articles 1-13 and our Sub-debt Indenture has the same with Article 14 thrown in dealing with subordination. The BNYM claim 22122 also has the CTs Prospectus of course.
I don't want the only hope for full CT payment to hinge on Article 8 in the Indenture, because we share that same condition with the senior unsecured we are subordinated to.
Cotton, Toogood, and Hestheman, feel free to pick this apart, because I want to be wrong! Although I feel comfortable that CTs will get paid down the road, just not based on Article 8 alone.
What would set our Article 8 apart from theirs, the fact they agreed to the POR and we didn't? Something else perhaps?
FEATURED NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM