Home > Boards > Free Zone > User's Groups > Value Microcaps Pick Six Lotto 02

Steel: 15% RULE:

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (3) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
lentinman Member Profile
Followed By 149
Posts 15,436
Boards Moderated 38
Alias Born 09/02/04
160x600 placeholder
HSBC Exit From Retail Banking in France Progresses; Warns of Pretax Loss on Sale
By Sabela Ojea
Bristol Myers Gets EC Approval for Onureg in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Galaxy Digital to Serve as Goldman Sachs' Liquidity Provider for Bitcoin Futures Block Trades
Colgate's Hill's Plans $250 Million Kansas Manufacturing Plant
Top Company News of the Day
FTSE Falls, Retail Sales Disappointment Raises Downside Risks for Sterling
Edesa Biotech Covid-19 Drug Candidate Gets Positive Review from Independent Data Group
Google Faces EU Antitrust Probe -Reuters
AstraZeneca Welcomes Court Ruling on Supply of Its Covid-19 Vaccine to Europe
Orphazyme Shares Plummet After FDA Turns Away Arimoclomol Application
FTSE Down, Pound Falls After Retail Sales, Seen Vulnerable to EU Trade Disputes
ABB Expands Parental Leave Program
Stocks Slip as Investors Continue to Absorb Hawkish Fed Turn
HSBC Hires Former Barclays Banker Ginsburg in Investment Bank Shake-Up -- Financial News
North American Morning Briefing: Dow on Track for Worst Week Since January
UKHospitality Calls for Measures to Tackle Staff Shortage
Lightsource BP Acquires 703 MW Solar-Project Portfolio in Spain
Acerinox Shares Drop After Nippon Steel Sells 7.9% Stake at Discount
FTSE Falls After Weak Retail Sales; Tesco Loses Ground
U.S. FCC Proposes Fresh Ban on Equipment From Chinese Firms Including Huawei, ZTE
Tesco 1Q Retail Sales Growth Slowed, Backs Fiscal Year 2022 Profit Outlook -- Update
London Shares to Edge Lower as Post-Fed Caution Continues
ArcelorMittal Launches $750 Million Buyback Following Cleveland-Cliffs Stake Sale
Tesco 1Q Retail Sales Climbed, Backs Fiscal Year 2022 Profit Outlook
lentinman   Thursday, 04/13/06 04:47:30 PM
Re: steeledge post# 1864
Post # of 2230 
Steel: 15% RULE:

There are three explanations of it in the IBOX under "MORE NOTES".

The bottom line is this. It is essential to have the rule or else the CONTEST would be a joke!

GAMM is a perfect example. The bid/ask is $.51/$1.08, yet somebody paid $1.39 near the close. That is CLEARLY a bogus number!

I encountered the same thing with RGMI. I wanted to BUY it at the close one day ($.43). However, the next day, it opened at $.67 on no news (see chart below - March 16). If it had opened at $.49 (or less), I would have gotten the trade. However, since the $.43 was a bogus number (!) then it clearly was not valid to buy it at that price. WHY? The reason why is because in real life I could never have bought it at that price. I eventually traded for it for $.65 - a FARRRR cry from $.43!

What if a stock was 20 cents and it had a bogus trade of $1.00 near the end of the day. Everybody who owned it would immediately freeze it at a 400% gain. The next morning, it legitimately trades back at 20 cents. That is clearly unacceptable because it basterdizes the entire contest!

Having been unable to capitalize on that very issue already myself in this contest more than enables me to make these comments. However, irrespective of whatever I personally did or did not do, it is just common sense.

SSK and I agreed to 15% based on no news. If a BUY opens more than 15% above the close then the trade is invalid. If a SELL opens more than 15% below the close, then the trade (or freeze) is invalid.

The only issue that was never dealt with, and one I'm happy to compromise on, is whether the person should have the option of accepting the opening price. I personally have no problem with that.

In other words, if my buy of RGMI had been $.53 instead of $.49, it would have negated the $.43 previous close, but then I could have been given the option to accept $.53, or not, by the end of the next trading day. If I accepted it, then the buy would have been at $.53. As it was, this issue had not come up and the open the next day was $.67 and I didn't want to pay that at the time, so it was a moot point.

In the case of GAMM, 15% below $1.39 is $1.1815. Let's say it opens at $1.00, then the person (in this case - SSK) should have the right to decide if they want to accept the $1.00 price or not - and, like everything else, they should have until the end of the next business day.



Warren Buffet: 5 minutes and 17 seconds of pure, unadulterated, bulletproof, flawless logic.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (3) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
Current Price
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences