Followers | 39 |
Posts | 707 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/10/2006 |
Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:40:13 PM
The industry is not very profitable (GZFX great example). So CC had very few to choose from. This GZFX was chosen is BS.
Having a high profit margin item on the floor is appealing to CC. GZFX has to give away the farm as they were at .002 before CC and dilution. GZFX needs the name CC. But CC loves the free cash for doing absolutely nothing.
Retailers are not filtering thru companies anbd choosing. CC will gladly take the free GZFX cash until VOD takes over. And no Pittsburgh satellite is going to save GZFX at that time.
And there is a reason why Netflix and the big dogs do not handle games. It is NOT Profitable to do both ! GZFX is certainly not proving this. They have generated tiny sub count and also make no money. (except for selling shares to market for cash). If it could work, Netflix would be all over it.
imo.
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. Announces Strategic Partnership Between Miranda Water Technologies and Fleming College • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 12:03 PM
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 9.5% Copper at Murex Copper Project, British Columbia • NBRI • Nov 4, 2024 9:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. to Assume Direct, Non-Dealer Sales of Miranda Water Technologies in U.S. and Mexico in First Quarter of 2025 • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 8:31 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Launches High-Demand Mushroom Gummy Line for Targeted Wellness Needs, Tapping into a Booming $20 Billion Market • CBDL • Oct 31, 2024 8:00 AM
Nerds On Site Announces Q1 Growth and New Initiatives for the Remainder of 2024 • NOSUF • Oct 31, 2024 7:01 AM