Edited version. Was too late
Ok. Thx for the explanation. Strange choice of a word for promoting, since it usually means to beat down. That's why I asked the stock price thing, thinking the flogging reference was to beat price down.
As to the pink listing, I thought maybe there were also certain requirements that comes w/uplisting that maybe they couldn't meet or afford, such as the auditing costs, etc? And so I accepted the only excuse I've heard so far, that being they were saving $ which they don't have and/or more dilution. I also thought that regardless, they still had option to report certain financial info, required or not & thought maybe they had been doing so because of the several times in last 2-3 yrs where they said they were taking steps to be "reporting". I assumed then, that they had done so, but from what you say, it seems not...
That's why I asked asked if the fact that they said they would, multiple times, and didn't (if they didnt) had any other possible explanation, than the apparent negative one. Since, as you say, it can fully shield insider sales, which otherwise would shed much light on the veracity on the company, then it would seem to be a big big deal. But I've seen nothing but promises from them & excuses here by pumpers, or, as you noted, the smart alec replies, indicative of not having the answers.
My read has been that from Chang to Sawyer, 2012 - all the way up to the recent (non) conference call, they indicated that reporting would happen, but apparently it hasnt (unless someone has info to the contrary).
If all that stands behind becoming reporting is a $30k auditing fee, while at the same time, I hear about all the very dilutive spending they did, which sounds in some cases awfully "rewarding" to certain people, it is then hard to accept the reason is frugality & it then seems to point toward cover up, for all I know?
So wouldn't it be easy enough and in fact in this case, be incumbent upon them to disclose some kind of official numbers to show & to to back up their claims of not having been selling off shares. Is it as simple as that or no?
I agree that all these things/questions, add up to be non-trivial. I think the questions raised about non accurate bio's deserve serious answers, when weighed against the level of self promotion the bod has given themselves & esp with the level of props been given them on this mb, ever since the bod change (mostly same guys as before w/Digifonica). The pumpers & proponents simply brush these facts aside....
I noted also, that the original plan was (as I thought made more sense) to develop the existing voip service provider, software & hardware provider business that this company was already "supposed" to be...into the real & true super leader in voip services, by virtue of the foundational patents, which would absolutely (supposedly) facilitate it to happen. And then, with that base, be able to also do the licencing thing, etc. That was the stated company plan, but instead, this other route has been taken, which has led to where we are now (15-20 cents & alot of blind faith)
What happened to the voip service, points phone, platinum, long distance, soft switches, etc etc ?? Why was there or is there no income from that?? Isn't that what Chang was gonna to use to get licencing going?? If not, how then? It was the stated company plan..
And if vp is able to pay 5 (or more?) legal firms for whatever the heck they do, then how is it that the sum of that resource cannot start at least getting some infringement or licencing actions initiated???
We dun care 'bout no stinking wrong photos, wrongs spellings, wrong bio's, wrong tweets, wrong PhD's, unkempt promises to be more transparent, candyman globetrotting to speak on current & future of voip, but never mentioned voip-pal of worldwide communication controlling techno, silly PR's about PR's, ambiguous word choices everytime it comes to something about the impending "sale", etc etc etc. We dun care cuz baby we gotz da goodies & that's all that matters. They're beatin our doors down
for the goodies, doncha know!
WHY HASN'T MICROSOFT BOUGHT IT???
