Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

but that # was thrown out about 13 or 14 mos ago by Mr Chang & it was not a value put on the patent pkg per se, but I think it was just one element of the potential value for only one year, if you read the whole thing. But he did indeed put a # to it, in a good way & w/o taking away all the other potential value. I thought he also had maybe a better vision of monetization, thru licencing, which if put in effect via some partnering, could very well leave a bigger & longer lasting legacy than a sale for a relatively small amt (but satisfies now). In fact, if I'm not mistaken, I think Mr Chang's reference to $200 million, spoke to licencing, not sale & for only 1 year!