InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 2393
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/22/2012

Re: None

Saturday, 09/20/2014 1:59:52 AM

Saturday, September 20, 2014 1:59:52 AM

Post# of 20775
I'm laughing my butt off.

The defense KHAWAJA In other words this is a insurance policy to Pfizer.We hold that now we didn't know if Intellect was ever going to get another patent if actually applied to what Pfizer did.So the milestone was setup.That's why there is a infringement matter and i'm LOL.

In one of the filing he states Pfizer performed and discharged all of its duties and obligations under the agreement.

I guess that why ILNS sued yall for nonpayment 2 million dollar milestone missed payment.

Pg.4 Pfizers memorandaum of law in future support

Pfizer dosn't dispute that the commercial sale of Ponezumab to treat A/D would infringe at least one valid claim regarding intellect 127 patent.

Hey dip stick the agreement was in full force until the world ended.The agreement was not terminated per section 7 of said agreement that both parties signed in the orginal agreement.

18 Pfizer admits it excerised the option for the license.

But remember you said in open court testimony you don't have a license.

What a complete legal cluster puck imho.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.