InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 321
Posts 17930
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/24/2009

Re: BeachBum post# 68476

Wednesday, 09/17/2014 1:50:00 PM

Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:50:00 PM

Post# of 93371
I respect that opinion
and suspect that you may be right. But I'd like to think, with HOPE of course (LOL), that there may be some substance to the Graffiti suit and that Ken would actually resurrect SDVI and prove himself to have been worthy of the good faith and trust of his prior following. It's just a wish for the good in men to rise above the amoral con. The wish may be in vain, but nevertheless there it is. And if there is substance to the lawsuit, I can still see lenders taking their chances. After all, we all did and I don't believe that we are as stupid as we may be made out to be. I know, more wishful thinking! LOL


SPDC trades at $3.00 for a reason. SDVI trades at .0001 for a reason. One has little to do with the other imo. No way >>imo<< SPDC could have secured that $$ deal after the lawsuit was filed if the lender thought they would be risking a loss with SPDC. The lawsuit clearly didn't influence the divesting of SPDC asset as opined. My opinion of course.

SDVI could very well get pumped in the coming weeks or months. Absent of news, the only way that happens is if a group accumulates enough .0001's to justify the work needed to run the pps on little more than BS.


HOPE FOR THE BEST PLAN FOR THE WORST
NEVER CONSIDER MY OPINIONS AND "DD" YOUR INVESTMENT OR LEGAL ADVICE!