Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Ha! I wasn't trying to, nor think I did, catch you in anything... I was convinced that you gave me the straight into & that I must've just been mistaken (re: the lawful/legal naming). But I was slightly perplexed because I have seen the names written so many times, I was pretty sure the vp label was "lawful". So your info was so promptly served up & looking all complete, lol, that you convinced me I had the names mixed up.... but (ahem) NOW I'm really messed up, to find I was right after all, lol. (I think?)

I didn't notice that you wrote "legal" for ea case & in parenthesis. So if u were having fun w/me & trying to get me all mixed up, you done good. But more likely I'm thinking you were trying to make some other point, in fact making light of "something"... just not sure "what"? Something tells me it's related to MS choice of patent name, in terms of "transparently copying" vp name & technology?? I'd like to hear your explanation of it.

The upshot is now I'll never be able to tell which one is which... but thanks for the uspto info & your added info. I have yet to be able to read it. I just thought it a reasonable idea to to investigate possible ulterior motives by MS (what a concept, nahhh). These sets of dates should help me determine if there is anything to my ideas.