InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 123
Posts 3857
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2002

Re: Patentinvestor post# 55391

Monday, 09/15/2014 12:51:41 PM

Monday, September 15, 2014 12:51:41 PM

Post# of 68424
I believe it is reckless to "guarantee" any legal decision or outcome, especially an en banc review being granted by CAFC -- because those have historically been granted around 1% of the time.

Also, I disagree wholeheartedly that big companies are "up in arms" or upset about the I/P Engine vs. Google decision handed down by the Federal Circuit. I believe they are celebrating it. They are rejoicing. They loved it.

Why? because contrary to what VRNG investors believe, this CAFC decision does not adversely impact any big patent owner. The patents of IBM, Apple, etc. are not in jeopardy of being invalidated. The decision was specific to the two Lang/Kosak patents. As wrong as that decision was in almost all of our eyes here in VRNG land, it was just one non-precedential decision concerning specific patents in a sea of thousands and thousands and thousands of other non-precedential decisions concerning other specific patents.