Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[GetSeriousOK]

No, there was no Cease and Desist order from AcuVector or the University of Alberta. That is not what the lawsuits were all about -- the exact opposite is true, in fact. AcuVector was seeking damages and the University of Alberta wanted a cut of the profits if there ever were any profits.

Read page 7 of the 2010 10K:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/838879/000114420411032218/v218209_10k.htm

"AcuVector is seeking substantial damages and injunctive relief against Dr. Chang for the effectiveness of the agreement and CDN$20,000,000 in damages against us for alleged interference with the relationship between Dr. Chang and AcuVector." that's not Cease and Desist. They wanted only MONEY from Radient.

"The University has not claimed that we are not the owner of the CIT technology, just that the University has an equitable interest therein or the revenues there from." That's not Cease and desist -- on the contrary, the Univ of Alberta WANTED Radient to develop and market CIT, and then the Canadians wanted a cut of the profits. Radient, therefore, did not abandon the CIT patent application "because of a Cease and Desist order during the litigation of CIT ownership by the Canucks in Alberta."

Who knows exactly why they abandoned the CIT patent application and the DR70 patent applications. Does it matter "Why?" The bottom line: Cit and DR70 are not protected by patent and there isn't a pending patent application for either of them.

Furthermore: Radient does not have patents in China, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and Brazil for Onko-Sure. If you disagree, cite the patent numbers. If these patents exist, they have patent numbers.

Maybe Radient has something for DR70 in Japan. I don't know because it's too hard to search their patent information. If there's a patent application in Japan, please post the proof.