InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12968
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: VictorMasonIsRight post# 21134

Saturday, 09/13/2014 7:57:33 AM

Saturday, September 13, 2014 7:57:33 AM

Post# of 133034
I'm POSITIVE I can PROVE this...

Having a bare bones infrastructure, if you will, when all you have to play market with is a set of patents & no income, is very very smart & appropriate way to operate for vplm. And they OBVIOUSLY have accomplished getting ALOT of work done, when you consider what it has taken to steer & maintain this ship to date. Gotta at least hand em that. And 1000's of percent growth in pps carried on a long moving avg, w/o blatant pump, ain't nothing to sneeze at either. CC's were wanted and granted (well, not quite CC's, but still pretty informational anyhow). Some damn serious looking patents approved amidst a time of tremendous growth & competition of technology being written in this arena, seems to be a pretty big accomplishment & so far while no one has proved it's efficacy & value, well, no one has disproved it either & all the past hokey stuff overcome & no debt.....and keeping it going w/o income yet a pps most have benefitted from. Alot of weird stuff & questions still threads throughout the whole thing, but overall, it doesn't smell too scammy to me, but I'm awfully concerned about the strength of the patents and I wanna know why no knowledgeable 3rd party entities ever steps up to validate the technology...???... only inside touts, mb touts & "supposed gnostic friends & friends of friends... This fact is very bothersome to me. Anyway, vplm deserves some props amidst all the boos.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News