InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 112
Posts 10856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2009

Re: diannedawn post# 98853

Thursday, 09/11/2014 12:26:33 PM

Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:26:33 PM

Post# of 163725
So much for the "slam dunk" win...
LOL!
Did CREEPY Covey...err...I mean the "good pastor", try to pull a fast one?
I doubt that will win any points with a Judge/Jury!

Seems he (intentionally?) failed to include a key point of Rice's agreement.
"Perhaps tellingly, Plaintiffs omitted the last sentence of that section, which limits the definition of confidential information and trade secrets
to information obtained during the term of the agreement:
Notwithstanding any of the above to the contrary, confidential information of the Company and APT
shall not include intellectual property consisting of customers, customer information, including
customer contacts, known to Rice prior to the effective date of this Agreement."

How exactly DOES someone "steal" information that was THIERS to begin with???
"Rice was permitted to retain and use the same pre-existing knowledge he had of “customers [and]
customer information, including customer contacts” that led Plaintiffs to hire him in the first
place."
Looks to me like Rice was hired to get them in the "big box" stores...
which he did...
and maybe that's WHY they've been struggling to STAY in the big box stores, ever since he left???

Poor widdle COVEY DOESN'T HAVE A CLUE how to run a business...
Must really suck to watch his shares, which WERE ONCE worth 270Million @ .03
turn into CHICKEN SCRATCH!!!


Bock! Bock BOCKKK! So LMAO!