InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 12715
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: VVVVVV post# 20692

Monday, 09/08/2014 3:32:45 PM

Monday, September 08, 2014 3:32:45 PM

Post# of 130965
I agree w/your entire post. Couldn't have said it better (longer yes better, no, lol). But I want to comment on what you only lightly touched on regarding your followup to 911 point. I'm pretty sure that all I posted about this issue is the correct case of how things are. And it obviously is such an important thing, it cannot be stressed enough. You note that you meant only re: dropped calls. 1st I've heard of that aspect, in learning about cellular 911. I don't know if vplm 911 tech addresses that or not. I have not seen anything to date to show it has. But if so & if the vplm tech does some measure more, of the ability to get back to a dropped call, IF THAT IS NOT ALREADY POSSIBLE, with existing cell technology, then I think that would be a very important plus and obviously would equate to lifesaving... That said, if this is the case, (and again, I haven't seen this angle spoken of in the patent or the touts) it still doesn't equate to foundational, nor would it necessarily get dispatch to the callers location. I hope you see what I mean, which is 2fold: one, that it has seemed to me that the proponents here seem to think that vp 911 simply gets dispatch to the locale of the caller, when conventional tech does not. And two, that any abilities to improve & even save only 1 additional life, are great, but not billion dollar foundational.

Thanx for getting back w/the point about dropped calls & please let us know if you have more info about that, cuz it is for sure important.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News