InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12741
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: BeerIsGood post# 20665

Sunday, 09/07/2014 2:32:50 PM

Sunday, September 07, 2014 2:32:50 PM

Post# of 131196
Ok. Thanks for that. Just wanted to make sure we were on same page. I'm not ready to go so far as to say its all bs. It certainly looks that way 99:1 vs anything shown to date to validate it (on a foundational level). That article really solidified alot for me & it validated every point I had made about 911 when I posted about it. If we are correct, then there is 0 possibility of vp911 to do what some think, ie, have some magic & mysterious ability to find a caller like is done on a line phone, thus in no way a foundational patent, in its abilities or I in it's need. That said, if it helps at all, even 1%, above & beyond avg existing cellular 911, then it can save lives & should be applauded. Supposedly all patents were tested & demonstrated, but of course, us lowly long shareholder's are not allowed to see such forbidden fruit... Makes me feel I'm an idiot or a dupe, that I even reserve judgement to call bs. They have however made it very hard not to.. And when intelligent & naturally inquiring minds probe for answers, the faithful, often blinders on, resort to ridicule. Pretty transparent & expected. What outside knowledgeable source (forget expert) can point to any vp patent as being foundational (absolutely necessary) to the current/future use of voip services. (considering the blueprints for the vp technology have been around for yrs to examine & scrutinize)? And WHY.........is that TOO MUCH to ask? The dance around continues...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News