Followers | 22 |
Posts | 1230 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/31/2010 |
Saturday, September 06, 2014 9:53:09 AM
However, the more I think of it, this would potentially be an easy scam to pull off on investors. You could always say that you intended to drill when you never really did. The state gets their money for the drill permit. They aren't going to investigate (or try to prove) that you never really intended to drill. It would be hard to do and they don't care to bother with it. You could still probably come out ahead even after the cost of equipment rental or in this case, waiting in line for it.
Not saying the company is guilty of this, but based on the sequence of events last May through August, I seriously question what was really going on. The former CEO leaving right before the supposed drill date? A sudden reverse split right before the intended drill date and right when the sheep were expecting a possible oil strike? Not re-filing their intent to drill in August?
This might be good to play for a pumped run, but I wouldn't play it expecting them to do what they say they will do.
Just my opinion.
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM