Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Is that to say then, that patents get granted which make varying levels, maybe even less than effective claims, so to then have a kind-of paper tiger of a patent, or at least one that is far less effective in the job of proving anything or defending itself against challenge? And/or, is it also my understanding that if the patent attorneys, we're not thorough, as you alluded to, enough in their anticipation of the possible circumvent attempts, that again, that doesn't keep a patent from getting granted, but would indeed weaken it's stance against various types of get-arounds. Do I have it right so far (before I go the wrong track)? It does so far, seem to make sense to me. And if I'm understanding it ok, I'm wondering how many folks have a falsified view of what a patent affords.