Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Thankyou for the answer. Pardon me for this quick question, as I didn't have time to fully read/absorb your answer (as I think it's very important distinction, in light of things. I will go back later & read it better. But does this mean that the onus is not created by the patent examiners, to prove anything outside of lack of novelty? And if so, do you agree that maybe too much importance has been assigned the fact that the technology was successfully awarded patents. I hope I said that right, not too short, not too long & not without soul of wit...