In case I confused, I just meant that the ppl who keep trying to convince themselves & ea other that there hasn't been barely enuff time for expect or facilitate a deal to have been made, isn't valid, in terms of how I have the laid out the scenario, common sense wise & not due to any special knowledge or expertise I have. I have been deeply looking at & trying hard to wrap my head around this very sort of thing, since 2008, when as a total newbie to finances & market, I jumped into it & boy o boy, have I had some lessons.
...............
"And to tell your shareholders that it's
worth what anyone is willing to pay them, is ridiculous, to say the least..Insulting and disrespectful. It's as stupid as telling your shareholders, they don't care about the share price. Be real. No shareholder wants to hear that."
*thank you so much for echoing my exact sentiments above. You maybe noticed me speak to that yest & I really struggle to find the right words. You said it better. I still am wondering if I perhaps read the person wrong, to whom I was replying to, when I spoke directly to that above, ie, the ridiculousness, crassness, disrespect, unfairness, on & on & on, most specifically the part about him saying it's worth whatever someone wants to pay. That's true & all fine & good as a standalone sentence, but when couples w/the situation where it was asked & especially with the miserable attempt the poster offered to use that statement as an example of how he answered to what is the minimum acceptable? Maybe I read the poster wrong maybe he was in essence agreeing with me by posting that ridiculous cc statement. If so I have to apologize. Anyway, you're right, it was an insulting answer. It was just kind of a duck & cover
answer from malek & not too much should be read into it anyway. To me, it's more a matter of how much stock (no pun intended) the msg board goers put into every word said at that cc. Yes, some of it can now be viewed as somewhat telling, in retrospect, but it's alot of off the cuff stuff plus I guess alot of prepared answers too. I just didn't put that much into it.
I am not a basher. I am going on 2 yrs long & never sold a share & needed to very badly during past year or so. I also have never accused the company of doing anything wrong. I also never found anything specifically wrong w/the patents. All I have ever said or thought, going back a year, when I found fault with a pr or something someone said (about the legal firm brought on & what was being attributed to them (the Skype deal), is that I want to see 3rd party validation of the efficacy & foundational attributes, of the patents & why, that hasn't been seen yet, roughly 10 yrs after their introduction? And even more so, now since there have been some pleas for such 3rd party validity. That's it, that's all I ask for. The rest is just kidding around & beginning to conjure up visions of all sorts of schemery going on. Also nice & heartwarming to know they pick & choose the questions ahead of time. It don't mean too much. Grain o salt. It'll be a circus.
