"You both are welcome to your own opinion I just disagree with it"...............
* whoa...Your reply is to me & while I may be a bit schizzed out, I am only 1 person. I am not so focused on this to remember or know who other one is, in "you both". I can only speak for & ans for myself...
"The fact that you don't think there are any companies out there that wouldn't want to talk to VPLM until all patents in hand."
..........
*. Sorry, I don't get what you are saying there? "don't think/wouldn't want"...sounds like a double negative or something & I can't relate to what you are referencing...?...and then you follow w/
"Again, it has only been 5 months."??? I just can't figure what you're saying. Maybe it references something the other poster said ("you both.. ")?? The only thing I even recognize there, is I have said multiple times that in my view, 5/6 mos is a lot of time, with this particular set of circumstances to have seen something serious happen.
"You reference 10 years but a lot happened in that time. Like the fact they were all denied. So why would you buy a company if your not even sure all patents would be approved."
............
* bcuz thst isn't what I said. I said that the 10 yrs represented the amt of time that the technical info has been available about the technology, so that any of the major concerns out there during that time, would've had much much more time, then the oft cited 5/6 mos time line. In other words I find it inaccurate to say it's only been 5/6 mos for the big dogs to have had the opportunity to do their expected job of being all over this, like flies on honey, so as to be fully up to speed & ready to get froggy & jump, when the time was right, bcuz after all, these patents don't exactly fall under the "take it or leave it" category, but rather the MUST HAVE AT ANY COST CATEGORY, no? I don't know why this is so hard for so many here to understand? I am sure I am being very straightforward about explaining & describing the scenario as I see it. I am certain it is reasonable logic (not counting my delusional episodes..). I think I am explaining it reasonably well..this has not been a secret & I have no doubt in my mind that these patent applications have been under the microscope for a very long time. Why would anyone doubt that?
"The bod also knows they have more leverage
when all patents in hand."
.............
* I didn't ever deny that. I don't think anyone has. It's true to some degree, but w/the undeniable (my opinion) facts listed above, the interested & capable "big dogs" could easily, once they did their DD on the technology, they couldve offered a major deal for the patents, simply contingent upon the patent awards. Is that not true? Why not? What's the big deal? I'm MS & we have had our spies & scouts on the case ever since the release of the info or word of the technology was put out there. And after yrs of scrutiny, by the best investigators MS $ can buy (which is near unlimited) we concluded long before the patent approvals, that this stuff was the real deal & truly foundational & worth near as much as we are...... and God knows, we tried to do an end run & sneak it thru ourselves, even tho it was a silly move to make "after the fact" (we're MS so we think we can get away w/anything), but we ran out of track, and now all the patents are awarded, and voip is growing like a teenager & this is seriously a once in a lifetime (yes, even for us..) chance to control a hell of alot, sooooooo it's time to quit pussyfootin' around.... and secure this sucker before Google or Cisco or someone else does, so hey, yo, vplm...check it out...we got xx billions w/your name on it, soon as you got the tickets, whadya say? (so what, is this not a sane scenario?)
AI
