InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 555
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2004

Re: smd1234 post# 9735

Saturday, 04/08/2006 5:33:18 PM

Saturday, April 08, 2006 5:33:18 PM

Post# of 17023
Re: Yusfdbk .... NukeJohn ...
by: Send me a message! nukejohn 04/08/06 05:30 pm
Msg: 946899 of 946900

The initial protective order that was put into effect in May 2005 is still in effect. That protective order is the order Kramer declined to lift....all parties agreed to it and it would be unfair to change the rules in the middle of the game. He will neevr lift that protective order.

The docs that Rambus filed in response to Samsung's Demurrer don't seem to fall under that protective order. I'm still not sure where those documents originated, but unless Micron can get a court above Kramer to issue a gag order (which is not currently a provision under CA law), then those documents become public in May...and the house of cards comes tumbling down. The sharks are circling, and they smell Micron's blood...and I'm not talking about Rambus sharks...I'm talking about all the shareholders lawsuits and the class action DRAM lawsuits from those harmed by higher DRAM prices.

NJ
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News