Isn't relying on NEJM for publication problematic?
One, what if they're, nejm, corrupt?
I mean if you're in academia, maybe not so much the sciences,
if you're not a lock step leftist, you're branded a nazi or atleast
a racist. And I'm not so sure the left hasn't gone full blown nihilism.
ACTC represent supreme human virtue and value. The leftist I think
is generally against this. They're certainly not open to other opinions.
Two, it seems like a complete loss of timing and tempo.
Timing is everything you know.
I don't see how you could turn such an important component of
your future success over to a third pary like this. Surely you
would need contracts, time limits, disclosure aggreement, etc.
