Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Thankyou. I'm aware of the legal firms associated w/vplm. I don't think vplm had the patents written by this firm. The patent were written for the developers of them in digifonica. Later, digifonica was acquired by vplm. Vplm did not develop them. As to if this firm would or wouldn't be the ones to work on licencing/infringement isn't the point. The point I made was that infringement & plan B has been brought up here many times & always dismissed as not possible because of no vplm $ to carry that out AND that is one of the reasons to be biased towards acquisition. So I was asking why, considering the vast fortunes implied, has not some firms stepped up to offer contingency, esp at this relatively late date, where it all pretty much languishes & has some selling out? You say the company not interested in anything but sale, but if you read their latest pr's (before the CC announcement) I think they clearly said different & clearly included that there was also licencing talks going on. No?