InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 779
Posts 39162
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/04/2009

Re: janice shell post# 28478

Tuesday, 09/02/2014 6:55:03 PM

Tuesday, September 02, 2014 6:55:03 PM

Post# of 39469
That means shit, really. Does Not Apply Here
and ING is going to be paying dearly for their wrong doings, AGAIN!

It is incontrovertible fact that the original issuance, as documented at the time--June 2000, long before Sid fell fore the advance fee scheme--was for 54 million euros.


Tiring I have to say this again, but
THE $PFNO BONDS ARE REAL!!
ING didn't hear us then, and how ridiculous is ING going to look
when press releases about some (until this trigger) Unknown Pink
is talking ING to the cleaners for $2,200,000,000 Plus Damages?

DOLLARS!!



FI$HING FOR THE NEXT TROPHY
$UPERMAN OPINIONS MAY CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE