Followers | 65 |
Posts | 3948 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/08/2013 |
Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:06:23 PM
My interpretation:
Remember, the judge is privy to documents from the discovery that we are not privy to. I will speculate, with a heavy degree of logic, that she is suggesting dragging out the discovery will not benefit the plaintiffs, probably because a "smoking gun" was found. In other words, more and more documents wont convict the criminal any more, they already have the defendandant stand over the deceased with a smoking gun, and a hate motive: The administration hates rich guys (hedge funds) and wants them dead. If not dead, they want to take away their wealth.
So, more documents in the discovery "would not benefit the plaintiffs". I think the judge is saying they are not needed, because if there was insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs, the only fair way would be to see if the discovery would uncover incriminating evidence. However, that is unnecessary, because Sweeney found the smoking gun, and we may as well move forward.
Bottom LIne. Sell your kidneys to buy more fannie, we are headed to trial, as the plaintiffs have passed all the hurdles to trial. If there was not a reasonable chance for the plaintiffs, the case would have been dismissed by now.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM