TheB.E.T
A skeptic is usually negative in nature, so yes, skeptics post a lot of questions that can be viewed as negative.
I may sound like a skeptic, but what I'm doing is asking questions that I think need to be addressed. All those percentages and numbers that you gave me were well thought out and interesting, but Cameron and Nash aren't looking at percentages and statistics, they're looking at what they see on Twitter. In psychology, One negative could equally thousand positives. It beats everything out because it makes you feel bad.
I guess my "skepticism" leads me to wonder whether it may be a good idea to experiment by broadcasting one episode free and seeing whether or not that increases the numbers significantly and by how much. Then they may decide whether or not it is a good idea to continue subscriptions or rather focus on ads and product placement/sponsorship revenue, rather than from subscriptions.
And by the way, I guess the reason I may come off as a skeptic sometimes is because I first got into trading penny stocks this winter when the marijuana boom hit. My account to went up to figures that I never dreamed I would see I was retired. I would follow my marijuana stock boards and be encouraged every day by all the positive, wonderful, electrifying comments about stocks were just going to continue going up, up and up. And I never sold. And then they went down and crashed. And then I finally sold 2 months ago with 10% of what I could've made.
That's a long story, but I guess my point is, is that positive comment after positive comment, after positive comment, saying that the stock is going to go to the moon and nothing is wrong with it, can be very dangerous. There needs to be well thought out skepticism and questioning.
I hope you enjoyed my rant Ha
