Here's what I'm worried about. And peoples thoughts are definitely welcome. Ganger TV is great, but couldn't Nash and Cameron just do the same thing on Younow (which I never even knew about before people started wondering the same thing on the gander chat and twitter)? I mean, the only thing that really makes us different is that we have the contract with Cameron and Nash (right?), which I hope they honor.
Also, when we are comparing to Twitch, I think we are talking about a company which has much greater scale because people connect and stream their own videos of them gaming (which could be millions and millions) that others (the viewers) subsequently watch. Therefore, I think the reason Twitch and Younow are so popular is because anybody (the average joe) anywhere can set up their own live stream.
With Gander, we are limited to the streams set up solely by Gander and the venues, which right now is only around 30...
Yes we are going to expand to other cities, but let's say they add another hundred venues, we are still limited to that amount of cameras streaming content. Or let's say we add another 10 to 20 artists, again, we are still limited to just those Who Gander contracts with.
My questions: Why would an artist choose Gander over Younow, where they might be able to get more viewers because viewers don't have to pay?
How is Gander really going to capitalize on a specific entertainment market (venues and celeb streams) when other much bigger companies could start doing the same thing quicker?
And taking this all into account, what is Gander worth if we are so limited in scale?
I would live to hear what people think.
-Nate
